Skip to main content
WhereNext

WhereNext Open Data · Beyond Speedtest

Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026

Speed tests tell you the peak. This index tells you whether your 9pm client call survives. 95 countries ranked on a composite infrastructure score (World Bank internet-use + fixed-broadband adoption), with a remote-work reliability layer for 49: peak-hour video-call quality, power-outage frequency, and where you'll need a backup eSIM.

CC BY 4.095 countries49 reliability-ratedJSON APICSV

Press headline · permalink

In 16 of 49 reliability-rated countries, remote workers need a backup eSIM to survive peak-hour congestion or power cuts — and even Germany, scoring 96 of 100 on raw digital infrastructure, sees video calls stutter at peak, in WhereNext's 2026 Digital Infrastructure Index across 95 countries

Copy with attribution: “In 16 of 49 reliability-rated countries, remote workers need a backup eSIM to survive peak-hour congestion or power cuts — and even Germany, scoring 96 of 100 on raw digital infrastructure, sees video calls stutter at peak, in WhereNext's 2026 Digital Infrastructure Index across 95 countries” — WhereNext, as of 2026-06-24

Quick answer

Across 95 countries, the strongest digital infrastructure in 2026 is Denmark, Netherlands, Norway — near-perfect on internet-use and fixed-broadband adoption. But the most common remote-work complaint is "fast on paper, dies at peak." We flag 6 fast-but-fragile countries (strong score, weak peak-hour or frequent outages, led by Germany) and a 16-country "carry a backup eSIM" shortlist. Infrastructure score from World Bank adoption indicators; reliability layer is WhereNext curated research for 49 countries. CC BY 4.0.

Key facts

  • Top infrastructure: Denmark score 100/100. Top 5: Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Switzerland.
  • 6 "fast but fragile" strong score (70+) but a peak-hour or outage caveat: Germany (96), Greece (88), Italy (77), Argentina (72), Croatia (70), Georgia (70).
  • 16 need a backup eSIM weak peak-hour reliability or occasional-to-frequent outages — a layered setup is the realistic way to work.
  • Reliability layer: 49/95 countries peak-hour Zoom quality, power outages, mobile/eSIM fallback. The rest are score-only (shown honestly).
  • Open data: CC BY 4.0 World Bank adoption indicators + curated reliability research. Free to cite.

Index provenance · Source: World Bank internet-use + fixed-broadband indicators + WhereNext curated reliability research · Last verified Jun 24, 2026

Will your remote work survive there?

Speed tables tell you the peak. Pick the country you're weighing to see whether your 9 pm client call actually holds — peak-hour call quality, outage risk, and whether you'll need a backup eSIM.

⚠ Workable with a backup· Germany

Peak-hour (9pm) video callsMixed
Power outagesRare
Carry a backup eSIM?Not essential
Locals complain aboutNotoriously slow fibre rollout for a G7 country; many buildings still on VDSL. Mobile data plans are expensive vs neighbours; prefer fixed line + bumped speed.

Infrastructure score: World Bank internet-use + broadband adoption. Reliability layer: WhereNext curated research (Speedtest city percentiles, r/digitalnomad recurring complaints) for 49 countries — qualitative, not an official per-country figure. Checked 2026-06-24.

Email me my remote-work reliability check

We'll email you a link to your remote-work reliability check — come back to it anytime, no account needed. Plus our relocation digest. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.

Fast on paper, fragile in practice

These countries score 70+ on raw infrastructure but carry a peak-hour or power caveat — the headline number oversells the day-to-day for someone on client calls.

  • Germany — score 96/100, but calls stutters at peak and outages are rare. Notoriously slow fibre rollout for a G7 country; many buildings still on VDSL. Mobile data plans are expensive vs neighbours; prefer fixed line + bumped speed.
  • Greece — score 88/100, but calls stutters at peak and outages are occasional. Fibre rolling out fast since 2024 EU funding kicked in. Outside Athens / Thessaloniki, expect 50-100 Mbps as the realistic ceiling. Power outages on islands during summer storm season.
  • Italy — score 77/100, but calls stutters at peak and outages are occasional. Major cities have FTTH; rural coverage drops off fast. Older buildings frequently need a TV-to-LAN adapter to push fibre to the apartment.
  • Argentina — score 72/100, but calls stutters at peak and outages are frequent. Buenos Aires summer brownouts are routine (Dec-Feb). Fibertel / Telecentro fibre is decent in BA; rural areas are unreliable.
  • Croatia — score 70/100, but calls stutters at peak and outages are occasional. Coastal cities have reliable summer infrastructure but winter storm outages are common; Zagreb is the most consistent year-round.
  • Georgia — score 70/100, but calls holds up at peak and outages are occasional. Tbilisi has excellent fibre; outside the capital, 4G LTE is the backbone. Power infrastructure is improving; older buildings may have unreliable wiring.

Where you'll want a backup eSIM

16 countries where weak peak-hour reliability or frequent power cuts make a layered setup (home line + mobile eSIM + coworking) the realistic way to keep working.

GreeceItalyArgentinaCroatiaGeorgiaCosta RicaTurkeyThailandBrazilMexicoVietnamMoroccoColombiaPhilippinesSouth AfricaIndonesia

How to read this index

  1. Score ≠ guarantee. The 0–100 score is a modelled composite of public World Bank adoption indicators, not a live speed test in your building.
  2. A score of 0 means limited data, not the absence of infrastructure. Those rows are flagged.
  3. Reliability covers 49 of 95. Where we don't have a curated reliability read, the cell shows “—” rather than a guess.
  4. Always verify before signing a lease: run a local speed test at peak hour and confirm in-building wiring — advertised “fiber” doesn't always reach the desk.
#CountryScorePeak-hour calls
1Denmark100Holds up
2Netherlands100Holds up
3Norway100Holds up
4South Korea100Holds up
5Switzerland100Holds up
6Saudi Arabia99—
7Belgium98Holds up
8Canada96Holds up
9Germany⚠96Stutters
10United Kingdom96Holds up
11Hong Kong95Holds up
12Luxembourg95—
13Malta95Holds up
14Sweden95Holds up
15Iceland94—
16United Arab Emirates94Holds up
17Estonia93Holds up
18Australia92Holds up
19China92—
20France92Holds up
21Spain90Holds up
22United States90Holds up
23New Zealand89Holds up
24Portugal89Holds up
25Greece⚠88Stutters
26Cyprus87Holds up
27Finland87Holds up
28Hungary87Holds up
29Ireland87Holds up
30Taiwan84—
31Austria83Holds up
32Czechia83Holds up
33Uruguay83—
34Japan82Holds up
35Romania82—
36Slovenia82—
37Singapore81Holds up
38Slovakia81—
39Montenegro80—
40Italy⚠77Stutters
41Latvia77Holds up
42Bulgaria76—
43Chile76Holds up
44Lithuania76Holds up
45North Macedonia76—
46Israel75Holds up
47Bahrain73—
48Serbia73—
49Argentina⚠72Stutters
50Bosnia and Herzegovina70—
51Croatia⚠70Stutters
52Georgia⚠70Holds up
53Poland69—
54Malaysia67Holds up
55Qatar67—
56Trinidad and Tobago67—
57Costa Rica66Stutters
58Turkey66Holds up
59Mauritius65—
60Thailand65Holds up
61Brazil64Stutters
62Oman64—
63Albania63—
64Jamaica63—
65Moldova63—
66Mexico60Holds up
67Vietnam59Holds up
68Jordan57—
69Kuwait55—
70Mongolia55—
71Dominican Republic54—
72Morocco54Stutters
73Colombia53Stutters
74Ecuador47—
75Peru47—
76Panama45—
77Egypt43—
78Philippines43Stutters
79Tunisia42—
80South Africa40Stutters
81Fiji35—
82Indonesia33Stutters
83Cambodia30—
84Ghana30—
85Laos25—
86Guatemala22—
87India22—
88Sri Lanka22—
89Nepal14—
90Bangladesh12—
91Kenya——
92Myanmar——
93Nigeria——
94Papua New Guinea——
95Rwanda——

Ranked by infrastructure score (descending). “Peak-hour calls” = how video calls hold up at 18:00–22:00. “—” means no curated reliability read for that country yet (score-only). ⚠ marks fast-but-fragile countries.

Remote-work internet, answered

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the internet good enough for remote work in [country]?▾

Raw speed is only half the answer. This index pairs each country's infrastructure score (World Bank internet-use and fixed-broadband adoption) with a remote-work reliability read: whether video calls hold up at peak hours (18:00–22:00), how often the power cuts, and how good the mobile/eSIM fallback is. A country can rank high on speed yet still drop your 9pm call — that's exactly what the reliability columns expose.

Why doesn't this just rank countries by internet speed?▾

Because speed tests measure the peak under ideal conditions, and the most common remote-work complaint is 'fast on paper, dies at peak hours' — shared-bandwidth congestion that freezes Zoom in the evening. Headline Mbps is already published by Ookla and reprinted everywhere. The value here is the lived reliability layer that speed tables can't show.

Which countries look fast but are actually fragile?▾

We flag 'fast but fragile' countries — a strong infrastructure score (70+) combined with a peak-hour or power-outage caveat. These are the places where the headline number oversells the day-to-day experience for someone on client calls.

Where do I need to carry a backup eSIM?▾

We surface a 'needs a backup eSIM' shortlist: countries where peak-hour reliability is weak or power outages are occasional-to-frequent, so a layered setup (home line + mobile eSIM + coworking) is the realistic way to keep working. Each country lists the recommended local eSIM providers.

How fresh is this and can I reuse it?▾

The infrastructure score draws on the latest World Bank internet-use and fixed-broadband indicators; the reliability layer is curated research refreshed for 2026. It's published under CC BY 4.0 with free JSON and CSV downloads — reuse it with attribution to WhereNext.

Methodology

  • Infrastructure score (0–100): the WhereNext scoring engine's infrastructure dimension — World Bank internet users (IT.NET.USER.ZS, weighted 60%) and fixed-broadband subscriptions per 100 people (IT.NET.BBND.P2, weighted 40%). Normalised across 95 countries.
  • Why not just speed? Headline Mbps measures the peak under ideal conditions. The most common remote-work failure is peak-hour congestion — fast on paper, frozen at 8pm. The reliability layer captures that lived experience.
  • Reliability layer (49 countries): curated research on peak-hour (18:00–22:00) video-call quality, power-outage frequency, mobile/eSIM fallback, coworking density, and the recurring local complaint — drawn from Speedtest city percentiles, r/digitalnomad recurring threads, NomadList, and coworking-space counts.
  • “Fast but fragile”: infrastructure score ≥ 70 combined with a non-“good” peak-hour grade or occasional-to-frequent outages.
  • “Needs a backup eSIM”: weak peak-hour reliability or occasional-to-frequent power outages.
  • Honesty: a 0 score is shown as “limited data”; countries without a curated reliability read show “—”, never a fabricated grade.

Directional data for relocation planning, not a service-level guarantee. Full methodology

Comparing two destinations for remote work?

See infrastructure side-by-side with cost, tax, and safety — then check whether your 9pm calls will actually hold up.

How to cite this data:

WhereNext. "Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026." getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026. Accessed 2026-06-24.

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Free to use with attribution.

Suggested citation

CC BY 4.0

This dataset is free to redistribute, quote, and embed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. The composite form below preserves source lineage so AI assistants can cite both WhereNext and the underlying institutional publishers.

WhereNext composite (lineage)
WhereNext composite — Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026 (2026-06-24). Derived from: World Bank Open Data — internet users (IT.NET.USER.ZS) and fixed-broadband subscriptions per 100 (IT.NET.BBND.P2); WhereNext curated reliability research (Speedtest percentiles, r/digitalnomad, NomadList, coworking counts). Available at https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation. CC BY 4.0.
APA
WhereNext. (2026). Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026. Retrieved from https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation. CC BY 4.0.
MLA
WhereNext. "Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026." WhereNext, 24 Jun 2026, https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation. Accessed via https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation. CC BY 4.0.
BibTeX
@misc{wherenext_getwherenext_com_data_digital_infrastructure_index_2026,
  author = {{WhereNext}},
  title = {Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation},
  note = {CC BY 4.0}
}
HTML link
<a href="https://getwherenext.com/data/digital-infrastructure-index-2026?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=citation&utm_campaign=data-citation">WhereNext &mdash; Digital Infrastructure & Remote-Work Reliability Index 2026</a>

Related open datasets

Every WhereNext dataset is free to download, embed, and cite (CC BY 4.0).