Open city data · 2026
Best value cities: quality versus cost
A transparent quadrant view of where city quality holds up relative to the cost of living.
Quick answer
Which cities offer the best value in 2026?
Across 374 cities, the best-value quartile pairs top-half quality with bottom-half cost; the strongest value scores are Taipei (40.5), Busan (36.2), and Ostrava (34.3) — computed from WhereNext's ICP-anchored cost index and a five-dimension city-quality composite drawn from its seven-dimension relocation framework, 2026-08-16.
Methodology
How we compute value
Value score = quality percentile − cost percentile. Quality is the equal-weight mean of the published city safety, healthcare, education, transport/infrastructure, and career indices; cost is the existing ICP-anchored city cost index. Both inputs become tied percentile ranks across the deduped city set, so a score compares relative position rather than mismatched raw scales. We merge district rows representing the same metro (Singapore and Hong Kong), then split the chart at the 50th percentile. The ranked list applies a quality-percentile ≥ 60 floor, preventing cheap-but-poor entries from leading it. Cost provenance is the World Bank International Comparison Program (ICP) 2021 basis used throughout WhereNext; the five city dimensions are the site's published city seed measures.
Free to reuse with attribution under CC BY 4.0. Download the JSON API or CSV.
Which cities are premium, budget, or bad value?
Best Value: Ostrava, Czechia pairs high quality with lower cost — quality at 70.6th percentile and cost at the 36.3th percentile.
Premium: Taipei, Taiwan has high quality at a premium cost position — quality at 97.1th percentile and cost at the 56.6th percentile.
Budget Living: Chiang Mai, Thailand keeps cost low but remains below the quality midpoint — quality at 40.5th percentile and cost at the 0.5th percentile.
Bad Value: Alajuela, Costa Rica combines an above-median cost position with below-median quality — quality at 45.0th percentile and cost at the 58.4th percentile.
Choose a best-value city if you earn location-independent income and want top-half quality at bottom-half cost — the top of the ranked list below is the shortlist.
Choose a premium city if career access or specific infrastructure justifies paying above-median cost for above-median quality; the trade is explicit in its percentiles.
Treat the bad-value quadrant as a warning label, not a verdict on any one life there: above-median cost with below-median measured quality means the price is set by something the quality composite does not capture — verify what that is before committing.
Best Value: 33 cities · Premium: 157 cities · Budget Living: 161 cities · Bad Value: 23 cities
Ranked answer
Top 25 best-value cities
Quality percentile ≥ 60
| Rank | City | Value score | Quality pct | Cost pct | Monthly cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taipei · Taiwan | 40.5 | 97.1 | 56.6 | $1,650/mo |
| 2 | Busan · South Korea | 36.2 | 97.6 | 61.4 | $1,750/mo |
| 3 | Ostrava · Czechia | 34.3 | 70.6 | 36.3 | $1,300/mo |
| 4 | Budapest · Hungary | 34.0 | 61.7 | 27.6 | $1,150/mo |
| 5 | Kaohsiung · Taiwan | 32.7 | 85.7 | 52.9 | $1,550/mo |
| 6 | Taichung · Taiwan | 32.7 | 85.7 | 52.9 | $1,550/mo |
| 7 | Tainan · Taiwan | 32.7 | 85.7 | 52.9 | $1,550/mo |
| 8 | Gdansk · Poland | 30.6 | 66.9 | 36.3 | $1,300/mo |
| 9 | Wroclaw · Poland | 30.6 | 66.9 | 36.3 | $1,300/mo |
| 10 | Krakow · Poland | 28.3 | 70.6 | 42.4 | $1,400/mo |
| 11 | Osaka · Japan | 27.6 | 99.3 | 71.7 | $2,000/mo |
| 12 | Fukuoka · Japan | 26.5 | 98.3 | 71.7 | $2,000/mo |
| 13 | Warsaw · Poland | 25.2 | 70.6 | 45.4 | $1,450/mo |
| 14 | Debrecen · Hungary | 23.9 | 67.8 | 44.0 | $1,450/mo |
| 15 | Pecs · Hungary | 23.9 | 67.8 | 44.0 | $1,450/mo |
| 16 | Szeged · Hungary | 23.9 | 67.8 | 44.0 | $1,450/mo |
| 17 | Seoul · South Korea | 22.8 | 98.3 | 75.5 | $2,100/mo |
| 18 | Tokyo · Japan | 20.6 | 99.7 | 79.1 | $2,250/mo |
| 19 | Brno · Czechia | 20.1 | 74.9 | 54.8 | $1,600/mo |
| 20 | Plzen · Czechia | 20.1 | 74.9 | 54.8 | $1,600/mo |
| 21 | Prague · Czechia | 19.2 | 75.7 | 56.6 | $1,650/mo |
| 22 | Porto · Portugal | 19.0 | 68.5 | 49.5 | $1,550/mo |
| 23 | Seville · Spain | 18.4 | 60.7 | 42.4 | $1,400/mo |
| 24 | Daejeon · South Korea | 18.0 | 97.1 | 79.1 | $2,250/mo |
| 25 | Incheon · South Korea | 18.0 | 97.1 | 79.1 | $2,250/mo |
Related answers
If cost alone is the question, the cheapest cities on $2,000 a month and best countries under $2,000 a month answer it directly. Whether local salaries cover local costs is a different question — answered by the salary vs cost of living dataset — and the underlying per-country figures live in the Cost of Living Index 2026.
The interactive chart below is an exploration layer, not the only answer: this server-rendered capsule, method, quadrant verdicts, and ranked table remain available without JavaScript.
Interactive view
Value quadrant explorer
Search and filter the complete deduped city set. Horizontal position is cost percentile; vertical position is quality percentile.